首页 > 英语四级
题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

Nuclear power plants provide about 17 percent of the world's electricity. Some countries d

epend more on nuclear power for electricity than others. In France, for instance, about 75 percent of the electricity is generated from nuclear power, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. In the United States, nuclear power supplies about 15 percent of the electricity overall, but some states get more power from nuclear plants than others. There are more than 400 nuclear power plants around the world, with more than 100 in the United States.

Have you ever wondered how a nuclear power plant works or how safe nuclear power is? In this article, we will examine how a nuclear reactor and a power plant work.

Uranium

Uranium is a fairly common element on Earth, which was taken into the planet during the planet's formation. Uranium is originally formed in stars. Old stars exploded, and the dust from these shattered stars aggregated together to form. our planet. Uranium-238 (U-238) has an extremely long life (4.5 billion years), and therefore is still present in fairly large quantities. U-238 makes up 99 percent of the uranium on the planet. U-235 makes up about 0.7 percent of the remaining uranium found naturally, while U-234 is even rarer and is formed by the decay of U-238.

Nuclear Fission (裂变)

A nuclear fission happens when a uranium-235 nucleus with a neutron captures another neutron. The nucleus then splits into two lighter atoms and throws off two or three new neutrons (the number of ejected neutrons depends on how the U-235 atom happens to split). The two new atoms then produce gamma radiation as they settle into their new states. There are three things about this induced fission process that make it especially interesting:

The probability of a U-235 atom capturing a neutron as it passes by is fairly high. In a reactor working properly (known as the critical state) , one neutron ejected from each fission causes another fission to occur.

The process of capturing the neutron and splitting happens very quickly, on the order of picoseconds (1×1012seconds).

An incredible amount of energy is released, in the form. of heat and gamma radiation, when a single atom splits. The two atoms that result from the fission later release beta radiation and gamma radiation of their own as well. The energy released by a single fission comes from the fact that the fission products and the neutrons, together, weigh less than the original U-235 atom. The difference in weight is converted directly to energy at a rate governed by the equation E = mc2.

In order for these properties of U-235 to work, a sample of uranium must be enriched so that it contains 2 percent to 3 percent or more of uranium-235. Three-percent enrichment is sufficient for use in a civilian nuclear reactor used for power generation. Weapons-grade uranium is composed of 90-percent or more U-235.

Inside a Nuclear Power Plant

To build a nuclear reactor, what you need is some mildly enriched uranium. Typically, the uranium is formed into pellets (芯块) with approximately the same diameter as a coin and a length of an inch or so. The pellets are arranged into long rods, and the rods are collected together into bundles. The bundles are then typically submerged in water inside a pressure vessel. The water is used to lower the heat. In order for the reactor to work, the bundle, submerged in water, must be slightly supercritical. That means that, left to its own devices, the uranium would eventually overheat and melt.

To prevent thi

A.Y

B.N

C.NG

查看答案
答案
收藏
如果结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
您可能会需要:
您的账号:,可能还需要:
您的账号:
发送账号密码至手机
发送
安装优题宝APP,拍照搜题省时又省心!
更多“Nuclear power plants provide a…”相关的问题
第1题
It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 that ________.A) it is not technical difficulti

It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 that ________.

A) it is not technical difficulties that prevent the building of nuclear power plants in the U.S.

B) there are not enough safety measures in the U.S. for running new nuclear power plants

C) there are already more nuclear power plants than necessary in the U.S.

D) the American government will not allow Japanese nuclear reactors to be installed in the U.S.

点击查看答案
第2题
What may delay the recovering process of nuclear power in the future?A.The French company

What may delay the recovering process of nuclear power in the future?

A.The French company -- Areva's monopoly status in nuclear market.

B.People's ever pessimistic view on nuclear power.

C.The high cost of nuclear plants and the indefinite cost of nuclear energy.

D.Governments' concentration on solving climate problems.

点击查看答案
第3题
The central idea of the passage is to point out potential problems regarding ______.A.effe

The central idea of the passage is to point out potential problems regarding ______.

A.effects of high-level radiation

B.operation of nuclear power plants

C.fallout from the explosion of nuclear weapons

D.various sources of radioactive wastes

点击查看答案
第4题
Admittedly, minor accidents and slip--ups continue to shake public confidence in nuclear p
ower. Given the unquantifiable risks that nuclear power carries, it is only right that the industry be subjected to the test of public opinion and due political process. However, this argues for exceptional alerts, regulatory scrutiny and accountability and not for bans or shut-downs. Those nuclear operators with a good safety record deserve to have their licenses renewed, so that existing plants may run to the end of their useful lives.

The Bush administration's enthusiastic support goes a lot further than this, however. It also wants to see new plants. Proponents of new nuclear power stations make three arguments in their favor. They will enhance energy security by lessening dependence on fossil fuels; far from being environmentally harmful, they will be beneficial because they will reduce the output of greenhouse gases; and, most crucially, the economics of nuclear power has improved from the days when it was wholly dependent on bail-out (紧急财政支持) and subsidy.

Yet these arguments do not stand up to investigation. The claim that governments should support nuclear power to reduce their vulnerability (致命弱点) to the OPEC oil cartel (联合企业) is doubly absurd. Little oil is used in power generation: what nuclear power displaces is mostly natural gas and coal, which are not only more plentiful than oil but also geographically better distributed. Security is enhanced not by seeking energy self-sufficiency but through diversification of supplies. Creating lots of fissile material that might be pinched by terrorists is an odd way to look for security anyway.

What about the argument that climate change might be the great savior of nuclear power? Global warming is indeed a risk that should be taken more seriously than the Bush administration has so far done. Nuclear plants do not produce any carbon dioxide, which is the principal greenhouse gas. However, rushing in response to build dozens of new nuclear plants would be both needlessly expensive and environmentally unsound.

It would make far more sense to adopt a carbon tax, which would put clean energy sources such as solar and wind on an equal footing with nuclear, whose waste poses an undeniable (if remote) environmental threat of its own for aeons to come. Governments should also dismantle (拆除) all subsidies oh fossil fuels--especially for coal, the dirtiest of all. They should adopt reforms that send proper price signals to those who use power, and so reduce emissions. Global warming certainly provides one argument in favor of nuclear power: but it is not sufficient on its own to justify a nuclear renaissance.

What's the public's opinion about nuclear industry?

A.People have little confidence in nuclear power for the potential disaster of nuclear accidents.

B.People think it important to exercise strict monitoring and effective management of the existing plants.

C.People believe the best way to avoid nuclear alit, aster is to shut down all the nuclear power stations.

D.People agree to prohibit the existing nuclear plants from running to the end of their useful lives.

点击查看答案
第5题
What's the public's opinion about nuclear industry?A.People have little confidence in nucl

What's the public's opinion about nuclear industry?

A.People have little confidence in nuclear power for the potential disaster of nuclear accidents.

B.People think it important to exercise strict monitoring and effective management of the existing plants.

C.People believe the best way to avoid nuclear disaster is to shut down all the nuclear power stations.

D.People agree to prohibit the existing nuclear plants from running to the end of their useful lives.

点击查看答案
第6题
In the early days of nuclear power, themade money on it. But today opponents have so c
omplicated its development that no nuclear plants have been ordered or built here in 12 years.

The greatest fear of nuclear power opponents has always been a reactor “melt down”. Today, the chances of a meltdown that would threatenUSApublic health are testing new reactors that rely not on human judgment to shut them down but on the laws of nature. Now General Electric is already building two advanced reactors in. But don't expect them even on USA shores unless things change in Washington.

The procedure for licensing nuclear power plants is a bad dream. Any time during, or even after, construction, an objection by any group or individual can bring everything to a halt while the matter is investigated or taken to court. Meanwhile, the builder must add nice, but not necessary improvements, some of which force him to knock down walls and start over. In every case when a plant has been opposed, the Nuclear Regulation Commission has ultimately granted a license to construct or operate. But the victory often costs so much that the utility ends up abandoning the plant anyway.

A case in point is the Shoreham plant onNew York'sLong Island. Shoreham was a virtual twin to the Millstone plant in, both ordered in the mid 60s '. Millstone, complete for $ 101 million, has been generating electricity for two decades. Shoreham, however, was singled out by antinuclear activists who, by sending in endless protests, drove the cost over $5 billion and delayed its use for many years.

Shoreham finally won its operation license. But the plant has never produced a watt power. Governor Mario Cuomo, an opponent of a Shoreharn start up, used his power to force's publicities commission to accept the following settlement: the power company could pass the cost of Shoreham along to its consumers only if it agreed not to operate the plant. Today, a perfectly good facility, capable of servicing hundreds of thousands of homes, sits rusting.

96.The author's attitude towards the development of nuclear power is _____.

A.negative

B.neutral

C.positive

D.questioning

97.What has made the procedure for licensing nuclear plants a bad dream_____

A.The inefficiency of the Nuclear Regulation Commission.

B.The enormous cost of construction and operation.

C.The length of time it takes to make investigations.

D.The objection of the opponents of nuclear power.

98.It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 that _____.

A.there are not enough safety measures in theUSAfor running new nuclear power plants

B.it is not technical difficulties that prevent the building of nuclear power plants in theUSA

C.there are already more nuclear power plants than necessary in theUSA

D.the American government will not allow Japanese nuclear reactors to be installed in theUSA

99.Governor Mario Cuomo's chief intention in proposing the settlement was to _____.

A.stop the Shoreham plant from going into operation

B.urge the power company to further increase its power supply

C.permit the Shoreham plant to operate under certain conditions

D.help the power company to solve its financial problems

100.From which sentence of the article can you see the attitude of the author and that of Governor Mario Cuomo respectively_____

A.the 2nd sentence in the first paragraph, the 3rd sentence in the last paragraph.

B.the last sentence, the last sentence but one

C.the last sentence in para.2, last sentence but one.

D.the last sentence in para.3, the 3rd sentence in the fifth paragraph.

点击查看答案
第7题
Admittedly, minor accidents and slip-ups continue to shake public confidence in nuclear po
wer. Given the unquantifiable risks that nuclear power carries, it is only right that the industry be subjected to the test of public opinion and due political process. However, this argues for exceptional alerts, regulatory scrutiny and accountability — and not for bans or shut-downs. Those nuclear operators with a good safety record deserve to have their licenses renewed, so that existing plants may run to the end of their useful lives.

The Bush administration's enthusiastic support goes a lot further than this, however. It also wants to see new plants. Proponents of new nuclear power stations make three arguments in their favor. They will enhance energy security by lessening dependence on fossil fuels; far from being environmentally harmful, they will be beneficial because they will reduce the output of greenhouse gases; and, most crucially, the economics of nuclear power has improved from the days when it was wholly dependent on bail-out (紧急财政支持) and subsidy.

Yet these arguments do not stand up to investigation. The claim that governments should support nuclear power to reduce their vulnerability (致使弱点) to the OPEC oil cartel (联合企业) is doubly absurd. Little oil is used in power generation: What nuclear power displaces is mostly natural gas and coal, which are not only more plentiful than oil but also geographically better distributed. Security is enhanced not by seeking energy self-sufficiency but through diversification of supplies. Creating lots of fissile material that might be pinched by terrorists is an odd way to look for security anyway.

What about the argument that climate change might be the great savior of nuclear power? Global warming is indeed a risk that should be taken more seriously than the Bush administration has so far done. Nuclear plants do not produce any carbon dioxide, which is the principal greenhouse gas. However, rushing in response to build dozens of new nuclear plants would be both needlessly expensive and environmentally unsound.

It would make far more sense to adopt a carbon tax, which would put clean energy sources such as solar and wind on an equal footing with nuclear, whose waste poses an undeniable (if remote) environmental threat of its own for aeons to come. Governments should also dismantle (拆除) all subsidies on fossil fuels — especially for coal, the dirtiest of all. They should adopt reforms that send proper price signals to those who use power, and so reduce emissions: Global warming certainly provides one argument in favor of nuclear power, but it is not sufficient on its own to justify a nuclear renaissance.

What's the public's opinion about nuclear industry?

A.People have little confidence in nuclear power for the potential disaster of nuclear accidents.

B.People think it important to exercise strict monitoring and effective management of the existing plants.

C.People believe the best way to avoid nuclear disaster is to shut down all the nuclear power stations.

D.People agree to prohibit the existing nuclear plants from running to the end of their useful lives.

点击查看答案
第8题
Why has the French government set a temperature limit on how hot nuclear-plant water out
flow can be?

A.Because the wastewater hotter than that limit will do a lot of damage to ecosystems.

B.Because the wastewater hotter than that limit will lead to damage to workers health.

C.Because nuclear power plants can be running at a lower energy level.

D.Because the French government is concerned about the climate change.

点击查看答案
第9题
"We thought there was a future in nuclear power when no one else believed in it," says Ann
e Lauvergeon, chief executive of Areva. The French, government-owned company is building the first nuclear reactors to be constructed in Western Europe for nearly 20 years. With" no oil, no gas, no coal and no choice", France decided to go nuclear in 1974, and today about 80% of its electricity is generated by 59 nuclear plants across the country. But even France became pessimistic about nuclear power: it stopped building new reactors at the end of the 1980s and in 2002 a government report called the industry a" monster without a future".

How things have changed. Nuclear power is back in favor, thanks to fears about oil supplies, energy security and global warming. France is ready to develop its expertise into a significant export. Its president, Nicolas Sarkozy, considers the sale of nuclear power to be central to his diplomacy: it is a symbol of France's technical power and a reaffirmation of its status as a global industrial power. Soon after his election 18 months ago, he toured countries from China to Libya to tout France's nuclear expertise, signing deals to open the way for French firms to sell reactors.

France has two competitive advantages in the field. First, it has the most recent and extensive experience of any country in building and operating nuclear plants. That has given Areva's "third generation" reactor design, called the EPR, an advantage over blueprints from its two big rivals: Westinghouse, now a unit of Toshiba of Japan, and GE Hitachi, a recently formed joint venture(合资企业). Second, French engineers have developed a new reprocessing technique, so that nuclear energy produces less waste than in other countries.

Areva's EPRs are under construction at Flamanville in Normandy, Olkiluoto in Finland and Taishan in China. Areva forecasts that demand for nuclear capacity could bring it orders for 60 reactors, or one-third of the total market, by 2020 -- each with a price of around 5 billion. Westinghouse has orders from China for four of its new AP1000 reactors, and GE Hitachi's ESBWR design is being considered by several American utilities.

The high cost of building new plants, arid the uncertainty over the cost of nuclear energy relative to other sources, could delay the nuclear renaissance (复兴), especially in the midst of a credit crunch. Luckily for sellers, governments are bent on tackling climate change and securing energy supplies, and are likely to offer big subsidies.

Britain, for one, has given its blessing to France's nuclear ambitions: in September Electricit6 de France (EDF), a state-owned energy giant which owns and runs France's plants (and is thus closely intertwined with Areva), bought British Energy, a troubled utility in which the British government held a big share.

What does the author tell us about Areva in the passage?

A.It is a French company, used to be owned by. private sector.

B.It has stepped into the third-generation .reactor design period.

C.Its third generation reactor has been constructed in France, Finland and China.

D.Its nuclear capacity will occupy one-third of the total in less than a decade.

点击查看答案
第10题
Questions 36 to 40 are based on the following. In the early days of nuclear power, the Uni
ted States made money on it. But today opponents have so complicated its development that no nuclear plants have been ordered or built here in 12 years.

The greatest fear of nuclear power opponents has always been a reactor “meltdown” (堆内熔化). Today, the chances of a meltdown that would threaten U.S. public health are very little. But to even further reduce the possibility, engineers are testing new reactors that rely not on human judgement to shut them down but on the laws of nature. Now General Electric is already building two advanced reactors in Japan. But don’t expect them ever on U.S. shores unless things change in Washington.

The procedure for licensing nuclear power plants is a bad dream. Any time during, or even after, construction, an objection by any group or individual can bring everything to a halt while the matter is investigated or taken to court. Meanwhile, the builder must add nice-but-not-necessary improvements, some of which force him to knock down walls and start over. In every case where a plant has been opposed, the Nuclear Regulation Commission has ultimately granted a license to construct or operate. But the victory often costs so much that the utility ends up abandoning the plant anyway.

A case in point is the Shoreham plant on New York’s Long Island. Shoreham was a virtual twin to the Millstone plant in Connecticut, both ordered in the mid-’60s. Millstone, completed for $101 million, has been generating electricity for two decades. Shoreham, however, was singled out by anti-nuclear activists who, by sending in endless protests, drove the cost over $5 billion and delayed its use for many years.

Shoreham finally won its operation license. But the plant has never produced a watt of power. Governor Mario Cuomo, an opponent of a Shoreham start-up, used his power to force New York’s public-utilities commission to accept the following settlement; the power company could pass the cost of Shoreham along to its consumers only if it agreed not to operate the plant! Today, a perfectly good facility, capable of servicing hundreds of homes, sits rusting.

第36题:What has made the procedure for licensing nuclear power plants a bad dream?

A) The inefficiency of the Nuclear Regulation commission.

B) The enormous cost of construction and operation.

C) The length of time it takes to make investigations.

D) The objection of the opponents of nuclear power.

点击查看答案
退出 登录/注册
发送账号至手机
密码将被重置
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改