题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[主观题]
It is commented by the author that the passages selected in the book is a ______.
查看答案
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“It is commented by the author …”相关的问题
The author thinks that Time commented on the Silent Generation with ______.
A．heartfelt sympathy
B．solid evidence
C．disguised praise
D．convincing criticism
A.challenged
B.classified
C.commented
D.calculated
A.commenced
B.commended
C.commented
D.commanded
A.mentioned
B.remarked
C.referred
D.commented
Of course, visually impaired people can enjoy many films when a friend explains the parts that can only be seen.But that means that blind people cannot go to the movies independently. To solve these problems, some movie theaters have begun to offer recorded audio descriptions of the movements, scenery, and special effects that other audience members can see on the screen.Blind moviegoers receive a wireless headset to wear during the movie. This allows them to listen to the narration while still hearing a movie's music and other sounds that surround them in the theater.
Another blind movie reviewer, Jay Forry, writes movie reviews that are published on his website. He also writes for newspapers and is a guest on radio shows. Forry gives movies one of five ratings, including, "So good, blind people will like it" and "I'm glad I couldn't see it." Forry became a writer after going blind at the age of 20 and he decided to go to college. His first articles appeared in the college newspaper, and Forry's writing skills and sense of humor are what keep people reading his reviews or listening to them on the radio.After "watching" The Sixth Sense, Forry commented that he thought the movie was excellent, but that he envied the boy who was the main character: "He had six senses, and I only have four."
1、What is the best title for the passage？ ______
A、Movies for the Visually Impaired People
B、Filmmakers Who Makes Films Interesting
C、Movies that are Rated from One to Ten
D、The Story of Jay Forry, a Blind Writer
2、"Visually impaired people" refers to those who _____.
A、are completely deaf
B、can't see anything
C、cripples when walking
D、don't trust in others
3、According to Marty Klein, a movie ____is most suitable for visually impaired people.
A、receiving the lowest rating
B、filled with many characters
C、without too many dialogues
D、being not too complicated
4、What do theaters do concerning with visually impaired people？ ______
A、They assign staff to explain some parts of the movie
B、They arrange movies especially for these people
C、They offer recorded audio description of the movie
D、They persuade these people not to go to the theater
5、We can infer from the last paragraph that Jay Forry_____.
A、is very upset about his misfortune
B、is good at writing reviews of films
C、became a writer before he's blind
D、doesn't like the film the Sixth Sense
The New Zealand Life Sciences Network，an association of pro-GM scientists and organisations，says the view expressed by Elaine Ingham，a soil biologist at Oregon State University in Corvallis，was exaggerated and irresponsible． It has asked her university to discipline her．
But Ingham stands by her comments and says the complaints are an attempt to silence her． “They’re trying to cause trouble with my university and get me fired,”Ingham told New Scientist．
The controversy began on 1 February，when Ingham testified before New Zealand’s Royal Commission on Genetic Modification，which will determine how to regulate GM organisms． Ingham claimed that a GM version of a common soil bacterium could spread and destroy plants if released into the wild． Other researchers had previously modified the bacterium to produce alcohol from organic waste． But Ingham says that when she put it in soil with wheat plants，all of the plants died within a week．
“We would lose terrestrial （生的）plants．．．this is an organism that is potentially deadly to the continued survival of human beings，”she told the commission． She added that the U．S．Environmental Protection Agency （EPA．canceled its approval for field tests using the organism once she had told them about her research in 1999．
But last week the New Zealand Life Sciences Network accused Ingham of “presenting inaccurate，careless and exaggerated information”and “generating speculative doomsday scenarios （世界末日的局面）that are not scientifically supportable”． They say that her study doesn’t even show that the bacteria would survive in the wild，much less kill massive numbers of plants． What’s more，the network says that contrary to Ingham’s claims，the EPA was never asked to consider the organism for field trials．
The EPA has not commented on the dispute． But an e-mail to the network from Janet Anderson，director of the EPA’s bio-pesticides （生物杀虫剂）division，says “there is no record of a review and/or clearance to field test”the organism．
Ingham says EPA officials had told her that the organism was approved for field tests，but says she has few details． It’s also not clear whether the organism，first engineered by a German institute for biotechnology，is still in use．
Whether Ingham is right or wrong，her supporters say opponents are trying unfairly to silence her．
“I think her concerns should be taken seriously． She shouldn’t be harassed in this way,”says Ann Clarke，a plant biologist at the University of Guelph in Canada who also testified before the commission． “It’s an attempt to silence the opposition．”
第21题：The passage centers on the controversy （）．
A．between American and New Zealand biologists over genetic modification
B．as to whether the study of genetic modification should be continued
C．over the possible adverse effect of a GM bacterium on plants
D．about whether Elaine Ingham should be fired by her university
The New Zealand Life Sciences Network, an association of pro GM scientists and organizations, says the view expressed by Elaine Ingham, a soil biologist at Oregon State University in Corvallis, was exaggerated and irresponsible. It has asked her university to discipline her.
But Ingham stands by her comments and says the complaints are an attempt to silence her. "They're trying to cause trouble with my university and get me fired", Ingham told New Scientist.
The controversy began on 1 February, when Ingham testified before New Zealand's Royal Commission on Genetic Modification, which will determine how to regulate GM organisms. Ingham claimed that a GM version of a common soil bacterium could spread and destroy plants if released into the wild. Other researchers had previously modified the bacterium to produce alcohol from organic waste. But Ingham says that when she put it in soil with wheat plants, all of the plants died within a week.
"We would lose terrestrial(陆生的) plants...this is an organism that is potentially deadly to the continued survival of human beings," she told the commission. She added that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) canceled its approval for field tests using the organism once she had told them about her research in 1999. But last week the New Zealand Life Sciences Network accused Ingham of "presenting inaccurate, careless and exaggerated information" and "generating speculative dooms-day scenarios(世界末日的局面) that are not scientifically supportable". They say that her study doesn't even show that the bacteria would survive in the wild, much less kill massive numbers of plants. What's more, the network says that contrary to Ingham's claims, the EPA was never asked to consider the organism for field trials.
The EPA has not commented on the dispute. But an e-mail to the network from Janet Anderson, director of the EPA's bio-pesticides(生物杀虫剂)division, says "there is no record of a review and/or clearance to field test" the organism.
Ingham says EPA officials had told her that the organism was approved for field tests, but says she has few details. It's also not clear whether the organism, first engineered by a German institute for biotechnology, is still in use.
Whether Ingham is right or wrong, her supporters say opponents are trying unfairly to silence her;
"I think her concerns should be taken seriously. She shouldn't be harassed in this way," says Ann Clarke, a plant biologist at the University of Guelph in Canada who also testified before the commission. "It's an attempt to silence the opposition."
The passage centers on the controversy ______.
A．between American and New Zealand biologists over genetic modification
B．as to whether the study of genetic modification should be continued
C．over the possible adverse effect of a GM bacterium on plants
D．about whether Elaine Ingham should be fired by her university
Christie's chairman【27】reporters after the sale, "it's a rare picture." A spokesman for the firm added, "It's fantastic." Not【28】who was at the auction agreed. One commented, "More money【29】sense."
Many people do【30】uneasy that a picture could be auctioned for such an unbelievable sum. They find distasteful the contrast【31】this sort of money and the impoverished life of the painter【32】Van Gogh, once a lay preacher among the miners of Belgium, was more【33】in producing work that dignified labor than he was in selling for a profit. Depressive, poor, unrecognized and【34】suicidal, he remains a romantic figure in the public【35】.
(41)
A．bought
B．sold
C．displayed
D．shown
听力原文： New research from Australia shows that pets are good for your health. The findings of this new study suggest that people who have pets are at less risk from heart disease than those who do not.
The new research was carried out over three years and examined 3,000 people. They took tests that measured a variety of different factors known to be involved in heart disease--blood pressure and blood levels. Also, people were asked about their lifestyles. The 800 people who owned pets had low levels on each of the factors measured than those who did not own pets. The study 'also showed that it did not matter what kind of pet was owned--a cat was as good as a dog— so the benefits could not be attributed to the exercises involved in walking a dog.
The question is just how pets manage to make their owners more healthy. The obvious answer is that they make their owners feel more relaxed and happy. The Australian scientists who organized this study commented that if a new drug was available that was as effective as simply having a pet, then this drug would undoubtedly be considered a breakthrough in the control of heart disease.
(30)
A．Pets manage to make their owners more healthy.
B．Pets spread many kinds of disease to men.
C．Pet owners enjoy better health because of exercises.
D．Pets can sometimes cause high blood pressure in man.
