题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[单选题]
This research team has found a new （)for cancer.
A.treatment
B.treat
C.cure
D.curable
查看答案
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
A.treatment
B.treat
C.cure
D.curable
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“This research team has found a…”相关的问题
A. Socialize with the research team members.
B.Ensure compliance with qualty standards.
C.Punish the research staff for making mistakes.
D.All of the abov
E.
The Corsi research team hypothesized that_________
A．city water contains insufficient chlorine
B．household appliances are poorly designed
C．toxic chemicals can pass from air to water
D．pollution is caused by dishwashers and baths
What did Cerling’s team produce in their research？
A) A map showing the regional differences of tap water.
B) A collection of hair samples from various barber shops.
C) A method to measure the amount of water in human hair.
D) A chart illustrating the movement of the rain system.
Why does Mayhew’s team use data that standardized the number of fossils？
A.They realize not all fossils can sample well to represent biodiversity changes．
B.They start to consider the variables that might influence biodiversity．
C.They want to check the previous findings with different research methods．
D.They believe sea level changes can lead to inaccurate fossil records．
Dr Steven Brown, from McMaster University in Canada, said, "It looks like when you are acting, you are suppressing (压制) yourself; almost like the character is possessing you." Brown and colleagues report how 15 actors, mainly theatre students, were trained to take on a Shakespeare role — either Romeo or Juliet — in a theatre workshop. They were then invited into the laboratory, where their brains were scanned in a series of experiments. Once inside the MRI scanner, the actors were asked to answer a number of questions, such as: would they go to the party？ And would they tell their parents that they had fallen in love？ Each actor was asked to respond to different questions, based on two different premises (前提). In one, they were asked for their own perspective, while in the other, they were asked to respond as though they were either Romeo or Juliet.
The results revealed that the brain activity differed depending on the situation being tested. The team found that when the actors were in character, they use some third-person knowledge or inferences about their character. The team said they also found additional reduction in activity in two regions of the prefrontal cortex (前额皮质) linked to the sense of self, compared with when the actors were responding as themselves.
However, Philip Davis, a professor at the University of Liverpool, was unimpressed by the research, saying acting is about far more than "pretending" to be someone — it involves embodying (体现) the text and language.
1.How did Dr Brown's team conduct their research？（）
A.By scanning the brain activity of some actors
B.By doing a survey with some theatre goers
C.By interviewing some theatre teachers
D.By consulting some experienced researchers
2. Which of the following is Not True according to the research？（）
A. When actors are acting, they are suppressing themselves
B. The subjects (实验的研究对象)were all theatre students
C. The subjects’ brains were scanned in a series of experiments
D. The subjects’ brain activity differed depending on the situation being tested
E. The subjects were asked different questions
3.What is the finding of Dr Brown's research？（）
A.Acting is not as mysterious as people think
B.Actors' brain activity differs when they are acting
C.Acting is far more than pretending to be the character
D.Actors' brain activity is more active when they are in character
4.How did Philip Davis react to the research？（）
A.He supported it
B.He doubted it
C.He explained it
D.He advocated it
5.What is the text mainly about？（）
A.A debate of how the brain functions
B.A play written by Shakespeare
C.A research on the brain activity of actors
D.A report of the cooperation of scientists and actors
Icy Microbes
In ice that has sealed a salty Antarctic 1ake for more than 2，800 years，scientists have found frozen bacteria and algae that returned to 1ife after thawing．The research may help in the search for life on Mars．which is thought to have subsurface lakes of ice．
A research team led by Peter Doran of the University of minois at Chicago drilled through more than 39 feet ice to collect samples of bacteria and algae． When Doran’s team brought them back and warmed them up a bit，they sprang back to life．
Doran said the microbes have been age-dated at 2，800 years old，but even older microbes may 1ive deeper in the ice sheet sealing the lake， and in the briny water bel0W the ice． That deeper ice and the water itself will be cautiously sampled in a later expedition that will test techniques may one day be used on Mars．
Called Lake Vida，the 4.5-square-kilometer body is one of a series of lakes located in the McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica，some 2，200 kilometers due south of New Zealand．This lake has been known since the 1 950s，hut people ignored it because they thought it was just a big block of ice．While at the site for other research in the l 990s，Doran and his colleagues sent radar signals into the clear ice covering the lake and were surprised to find that 62 feet below there was a pool of liquid water that was about seven times more salty than seawater．
That prompted the researchers to return in 1996 with equipment to drill a hole down to within a few feet of the water laver． At the bottom of this hole，researchers harvested specimens of algae and bacteria．
The searchers will return in 2004 equipped with instruments that are sterilized． They will then drill through the full 62 feet of ice and sample some of the briny water from the lake for analysis．The water specimen will be cultured to see if it contains life． Specimens from the water are expected to be even older than the life forms extracted from the ice covering．
第 9 题 Paragraph 2_________．
The research identified happy and unhappy spouses, culled(选出) from a national database. Of the unhappy partners who divorced, about half were happy five years later. But unhappy spouses who stuck it out often did better. About two-thirds were happy five years later. Study results contradict what seems to be common sense, says David Blankenhorn of the Institute for American Values, a think-tank on the family. The institute helped sponsor the research team based at the University of Chicago. Findings will be presented in Arlington, Va., at the "Smart Marriage" conference, sponsored by the Coalition for Marriage, Families and Couples Education.
The study looked at data on 5,232 married adults from the National Survey of Families and Households. It included 645 who were unhappy. The adults in the national sample were analyzed through 13 measures of psychological well-being. Within the five years, 167 of the unhappy were divorced or separated and 478 stayed married.
Divorce didn't reduce symptoms of depression, raise self-esteem or increase a sense of mastery compared with those who stayed married, the report says. Results were controlled for factors including race, age, gender and income. Staying married did not tend to trap unhappy spouses in violent relationships. What helped the unhappy married turn things around？ To supplement the formal study data, the research team asked professional firms to recruit focus groups totaling 55 adults who were "marriage survivors". All had moved from unhappy to happy marriages. These 55 once-discontented married felt their unions got better via one of three routes, the report says:
Marital endurance. "With time, job situations improved, children got older or better, or chronic ongoing problems got put into new perspective." Partners did not work on their marriages.
Marital work. Spouses actively worked "to solve problems, change behavior. or improve communication".
Personal change. Partners found "alternative ways to improve their own happiness and build a good and happy life despite a mediocre marriage." In effect, the unhappy partner changed.
According to David Blankenhorn, people commonly believe that ______.
A．divorce is a better solution to an unhappy marriage than staying together
B．divorce is not necessarily the only solution to an unhappy marriage
C．keeping an unhappy marriage needs much courage and endurance
D．to end an unhappy marriage or net is a tough decision for the spouses
Yet multiple authorship—however good it may be in other ways--presents problems for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is research misconduct, how should the liability be allocated among the authors？ If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review？
Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author's particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road. Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names, agonize over whether a much-cited paper was really the candidate's work or a coauthor's, and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility.
Problems of this kind change the argument, supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles. After all, if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions, then the judges better know what they did. But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole, whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field, a team is a team, and the members should share the credit or the blame.
According to the passage, there is a tendency that scientific papers ______
A．are getting more complicated
B．are dealing with bigger problems
C．are more of a product of team work
D．are focusing more on natural than on social sciences
