题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[判断题]
Treasury stock is a company's own stock that has been reacquired.（)
查看答案
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“Treasury stock is a company's …”相关的问题
A、Is an asset.
B、Increases total stockholders' equity.
C、Decreases total stockholders' equity.
D、Does not change total stockholders' equity.
A、$0.
B、$40,000.
C、$100,000.
D、$200,000.
Privatization would begin by diverting payroll taxes, which pay for current Social Security benefits, into personal investment accounts. The government would have to borrow to make up the shortfall. This would sharply increase the government's debt. "Never mind", privatization advocates say, "in the long run, people would make so much on personal accounts that the government could save money by cutting retirees' benefits."
Even so, if personal investment accounts were invested in Treasury bonds, this whole process would accomplish precisely nothing. The interest workers would receive on their accounts would exactly match the interest the government would have to pay on its additional debt. To compensate for the initial borrowing, the government would have to cut future benefits so much that workers would gain nothing at all. However, privatizers claim that these investments would make a lot of money and that, in effect, the government, not the workers, would reap most of those gains, because as personal accounts grew, the government could cut benefits.
We can argue at length about whether the high stock returns such schemes assume are realistic (they aren't), but let's cut to the chase: in essence, such schemes involve having the government borrow heavily and put the money in the stock market. That's because the government would, in effect, confiscate workers' gains in their personal accounts by cutting those workers' benefits.
Once you realize what privatization really means, it doesn't sound too responsible, does it？ But the details make it considerably worse. First, financial markets would, correctly, treat the reality of huge deficits today as a much more important indicator of the government's fiscal health than the mere promise that government could save money by cutting benefits in the distant future. After all, a government bond is a legally binding promise to pay, while a benefits formula that supposedly cuts costs 40 years from now is nothing more than a suggestion to future Congresses. If a privatization plan passed in 2005 called for steep benefit cuts in 2045, what are the odds that those cuts would really happen？ Second, a system of personal accounts would pay huge brokerage fees. Of course, from Wall Street's point of view that's a benefit, not a cost.
According to the author, "privatizers" are those ______ .
A．who borrow from banks to invest in the stock market
B．who invest in Treasury bonds
C．who advocate the government to borrow money from citizens
D．who earn large sums of money in personal accounts
The term investment portfolio (证卷投资组合) conjures up visions of the truly rich--the Rockefellers, the WalMart Waltons, Bill Gates. But today, everyone--from the Philadelphia firefighter, his part-time receptionist wife and their three children, to the single Los Angeles lawyer, starting out on his own--needs a portfolio.
A portfolio is simply a collection of financial assets, it may include real estate, rare stamps and coins, precious metals and even artworks. But those are for people with expertise. What most of us need to know about arc stocks, bonds and cash (including such cash equivalents as money market funds).
How do you decide what part of your portfolio should go to each of the big three？ Begin by urulerstanding that stocks pay higher returns but are more risky; bonds and cash pay lower returns but are less risky.
Reach by Ibbotson Associates, for example, shows that large company stocks, on average, have returned 11.2 percent annually since 1926. Over the same period, by comparison, bonds have returned an annual average of 5.3 percent and cash, 3.8 percent.
But short term risk is another matter. In 1974, a one-year ＄1000 investment in the stock market would have declined to ＄735.
With bonds, there are two kinds of risk: that the borrower won't pay you back and that the money you'll get won't be worth very much. The U.S. government stands behind treasury bonds, so the credit risk is almost nil. But the inflation risk remains. Say you buy a ＄1000 bond maturing in ten years. If inflation averages about seven percent over that time, then the＄1000 you receive at maturity can only buy ＄500 worth of today's goods.
With cash, the inflation risk is lower, since over a long period you can keep rolling over your CDs every year (or more often). If inflation rises, interest rates rise to compensate.
As a result, the single most important rule in building a portfolio is this: If you don't need the money for a long time, then put it into stocks. If you need it soon, put it into bonds and cash.
This passage is intended to give 'advice on______.
A．how to avoid inflation risks
B．what kinds of bonds to buy
C．how to get rich by investing in stock market
D．how to become richer by spreading the risk
A.A gain account is credite
B.A loss is reporte
C.A revenue account is credite
D.Paid-in capital is increase
E.
The Treasury is the part of the government which ______(掌管政府财政的收支).
A．They think their actions are too dramatic for the situation.
B．Being picky at first, they finally support their actions.
C．They totally approve of the dramatic interventions for the experience of 1929.
D．They think the banking catastrophe now is not a big deal.
A.A reduction of total shareholders' equity.
B.A reduction of total paid-in capital.
C.A reduction to retained earnings.
D.An expense on the income statement.
